Welcome to the Rabbit Hole

You don’t have to agree with us. We want you to have access to the truth and understand what’s happening, know where the information comes from, & make your own decision.

Understanding local politics shouldn’t have to be this complicated, but it is. You shouldn’t have to dig through years of board minutes, legal documents, and financial statements to know where your money goes, how it’s being spent, or who’s responsible in spending it.

And yet, that’s exactly what’s happening in Downtown Chula Vista. The property owners and business owners pay into a collective fund that’s meant to service and improve a defined district, otherwise known as a PBID (Property and Business Improvement District). With a reported $992,954.66 in total district income, the City of Chula Vista granted The Downtown Chula Vista Association, formerly known as Third Avenue Village Association, or TAVA, as the PBID administrator. In 2021, TAVA hired a contracted management company, New City America, or NCA, to provide administrative management. NCA was already developing a reputation for their oversight in a few PBIDs in Southern California, specifically San Diego’s Little Italy.

Why is This Important?

DCVA is registered as a private nonprofit corporation, and is made of 14 Board of Directors, but the bylaws allow for up to 17 directors. As the PBID’s designated owner’s association , DCVA is responsible for administering the district’s activities and overseeing its finances. The Board of Directors governs the corporation, while DCVA contracts with New City America to provide administrative management services.

The question that caught my attention was, who is really in charge of the agency, the PBID, and the money? According to DCVA’s bylaws, the corporation has no members. Property owners and business owners within the district are not members with voting rights. Instead, the rights that would ordinarily belong to members are fixed in the Board of Directors.

That means property owners and business owners who are subject to the PBID assessment do not have a direct vote in selecting DCVA’s Board. Board vacancies are filled by the existing Board, giving the Board significant control over who joins its governing body.

And while the bylaws establish term limits, there are documented instances in which individuals have changed their Board titles and continued serving on the Board under a new term.

As of September 1, 2026, David Graham, Director of Economic Development for the City of Chula City, proposed to renew the PBID for twenty years; as opposed to the typical 10 year period California statutes states. It is unclear if the city has authority to modify the duration limitation listed in the California Streets and Highways Code.

What this site is & why it exists

Choose your journey